[srm-cvs] CVS Update: - Update OS and Sockets FAQs

From: <d.rethans[@]jdimedia.nl>
Date: Wed Feb 20 2002 - 19:00:22 CET

Date: Wed Feb 20 19:00:22 CET 2002
User: Derick Rethans
Directory: srmdoc/user

Log Message:
 [0.25]
 - Update OS and Sockets FAQs
 
Modified files:
           srmdoc/user/faq.xml (version: 1.4)

[FILE: /srmdoc/user/faq.xml]

--- srmdoc/user/faq.xml:1.3 Sun Feb 17 19:28:02 2002 GMT
+++ srmdoc/user/faq.xml Wed Feb 20 17:00:22 2002 GMT
@@ -41,15 +41,15 @@
   <qandaentry id="faq.sockets">
    <question>
     <para>
- Aren't sockets slow?
+ Aren't TCP/IP sockets slow?
     </para>
    </question>
    <answer>
     <para>
- Yes they are, but you have to consider that SRM can be run on
- a box other then the main server. If SRM is run on the same
- machine as the webserver, the client API makes use of UNIX
- domain sockets.
+ Yes they are, but you have to consider that SRM can be run on a box other
+ then the main server. If SRM is run on the same machine as the webserver,
+ you can use the UNIX domain socket interface. According to benchmarks
+ this should be around 12 times faster then TCP/IP sockets.
     </para>
    </answer>
   </qandaentry>
@@ -79,9 +79,9 @@
    </question>
    <answer>
     <para>
- SRM is tested on Linux, OpenBSD and Solaris/Intel. But it may work on
- other operating systems just fine. Please let us now if you was able to
- run SRM on other systems.
+ SRM is tested on Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and Solaris/Intel. But it may
+ work on other operating systems just fine. Please let us now if you was
+ able to run SRM on other systems.
     </para>
    </answer>
   </qandaentry>
Received on Wed Feb 20 19:00:13 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 06 2009 - 09:00:03 CET